Lots of ink on GM's plug-in hybrid announcement. With headlines like "GM Promises Plug-in Hybrid," Waggoner's statement in LA moves plug-in cars back into the public discussion of petroleum alternatives. "Environmentalists" generally were credited with pressuring GM toward green technologies, and Roland Hwang of NRDC rightly questions whether GM's plans are mere "smoke and mirrors." While espousing the "electrification of the automobile," Waggoner made no firm committment.
Unfortunately, our major environmental organizations have made no firm committment, either. The environmental Big Three - Sierra Club, Natural Resources Defense Council, and the Union of Concerned Scientists - remain on the sidelines of the plug-in discussion. Jason Mark of UCS responded to Waggoner's speech in the LA Times and Scientific American by ignoring the challenge and benefits of plug-in cars. He derides automakers for not focusing on more efficient internal combution engines. "They should be combining existing technologies to give us 5- and 10-mile-per-gallon improvements." Could there be a more pathetic response?
These organizations continue to call for a focus on more efficient gasoline cars, a policy with two decades of failure and no hope of actually solving the problems of petroleum dependence and global warming.
Irony abounds. George Bush, oilman, seems to understand the commonsense benefits of plug-in hybrids. And now Rick Waggoner of GM, creator and killer of the EV1, has again breached the industry taboo on connecting to the cleaner, cheaper, ubiquitous electric grid. Speaking at an energy alternatives forum recently, Ex-CIA Director and neo-con "[James] Woolsey advocated moving away from cars that run on petroleum..... and [Sierra Club Global Warming Director Dan] Becker argued for making cars that go further on a tank of gas."
We'd be a lot further along if professional environmentalists heeded logic and science and advocated for plug-in cars. Roland: When will that long-promised plug-in study appear?
Sources:
www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/29/AR2006112901343.html
www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-gm30nov30,1,4421824.story?coll=la-headlines-business
www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa001&articleID=19781CFBCF60D73CB688A6C6CA5E55FF
www.infoisrael.net/cgi-local/text.pl?source=4/b/i/091120061
Home » UCS » Is GM's Plug-in Hybrid for Real? What Say Big Enviro?
Is GM's Plug-in Hybrid for Real? What Say Big Enviro?
09:02
Unknown
Labels:
environmentalism,
NRDC,
UCS
Popular Post
-
Much has been made of late of Toyota and other automakers claims they will commercialize hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in 2015. Of course, we...
-
V12 / 5.576 cc / 385 PS / 406 ft/lb (550 Nm) @ 4.000 / 0 - 62 mph (100 km/h): 6,6 s / Vmax: 155 mph (250 km/h) (click images for a larger ...
-
F ollowing my post, Exploring Unchartered Regions , I've finally managed to pull through 'the feat' today. It was actually the 0...
-
Photo: Diane Edwardson, October 15, 2011. The southeast edge of the Metrolink maintenance yard is near the Confluence of the LA River. (Cl...
-
We are delighted to report a new development. The ingenuity of the drivers of Aberdeen Cars never ceases to amaze! And delight! Here we see ...
-
(click image for a larger view)
-
Super brilliant UK quartet The Number has posted a brand new version (radio edit) of old track Jolan District . A version that, believe it ...
-
Size no obstacle to safety The latest version of Land Rover's smallest 4x4 model, the Freelander 2, has been awarded the maximum five st...
-
Is this another future car previewed by a die-cast model? It seems so. After a Hot Wheels toy model gave us our first look at the 2013 SRT...
-
Good morning, y'all! In today's Writing in my Car, author Patricia Sands talks about starting her writing journey -- the surprises,...
No comments:
Post a Comment