Lots of ink on GM's plug-in hybrid announcement. With headlines like "GM Promises Plug-in Hybrid," Waggoner's statement in LA moves plug-in cars back into the public discussion of petroleum alternatives. "Environmentalists" generally were credited with pressuring GM toward green technologies, and Roland Hwang of NRDC rightly questions whether GM's plans are mere "smoke and mirrors." While espousing the "electrification of the automobile," Waggoner made no firm committment.
Unfortunately, our major environmental organizations have made no firm committment, either. The environmental Big Three - Sierra Club, Natural Resources Defense Council, and the Union of Concerned Scientists - remain on the sidelines of the plug-in discussion. Jason Mark of UCS responded to Waggoner's speech in the LA Times and Scientific American by ignoring the challenge and benefits of plug-in cars. He derides automakers for not focusing on more efficient internal combution engines. "They should be combining existing technologies to give us 5- and 10-mile-per-gallon improvements." Could there be a more pathetic response?
These organizations continue to call for a focus on more efficient gasoline cars, a policy with two decades of failure and no hope of actually solving the problems of petroleum dependence and global warming.
Irony abounds. George Bush, oilman, seems to understand the commonsense benefits of plug-in hybrids. And now Rick Waggoner of GM, creator and killer of the EV1, has again breached the industry taboo on connecting to the cleaner, cheaper, ubiquitous electric grid. Speaking at an energy alternatives forum recently, Ex-CIA Director and neo-con "[James] Woolsey advocated moving away from cars that run on petroleum..... and [Sierra Club Global Warming Director Dan] Becker argued for making cars that go further on a tank of gas."
We'd be a lot further along if professional environmentalists heeded logic and science and advocated for plug-in cars. Roland: When will that long-promised plug-in study appear?
Sources:
www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/29/AR2006112901343.html
www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-gm30nov30,1,4421824.story?coll=la-headlines-business
www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa001&articleID=19781CFBCF60D73CB688A6C6CA5E55FF
www.infoisrael.net/cgi-local/text.pl?source=4/b/i/091120061
Home » UCS » Is GM's Plug-in Hybrid for Real? What Say Big Enviro?
Is GM's Plug-in Hybrid for Real? What Say Big Enviro?
09:02
Unknown
Labels:
environmentalism,
NRDC,
UCS
Popular Post
-
If you were 3 years old, what car do you want your parents to own? It's not an easy question to ask a 3 year old as there answers are l...
-
There needs to be a book called Carpooling for dummies written by art car central that helps people drive and park in around swimmin...
-
V12 / 5.576 cc / 385 PS / 406 ft/lb (550 Nm) @ 4.000 / 0 - 62 mph (100 km/h): 6,6 s / Vmax: 155 mph (250 km/h) (click images for a larger ...
-
Aston Martin has today confirmed the company's intention to revive the historic British Lagonda marque. In a statement announcing the n...
-
go full screen on the below video found on http://www.jalopyjournal.com/?p=16967 famed auto designer Daniel Simon to pen up a concept and ...
-
This car sent in by Jake Stichler This is a 92 F150, currently residing in Lebanon, PA with nearly a quarter million miles that I picked up ...
-
Talks in Brussels between troubled banking group RBS and the EU have raised the prospect that the group's major motoring brands Direct L...
-
The Bubble Truck is a modified 2001 Dodge Ram 1500 extended cab pickup truck "sculptured" with a variety of ornaments and other d...
-
From what I recall from reading the superb book 'The Fast Set' about the British land speed record racers in the 1920's and 1930...
-
Here's our undercover agent "Codename JannieJumbo" cycling about maintaining his legend as an 'activist' within the so...
No comments:
Post a Comment