Almost every American who drives (and for better or worse that's most of us), must pay oil companies for the privilege. And they make a good profit. But it's not enough to sell a product and make the biggest profits in the history of the world.
Today's NYTimes has a big story about one way oil and gas companies continue to steal from us. They drill on public lands and are meant to pay US royalties. One of the Interior Department's auditors, Bobby Maxwell, had been doing his job well for 22 years, recovering hundreds of millions in underreported royalties. A self-described conservative, Maxwell found that agressive pursuit of industry for fair payment didn't fit with the new Bush administration's approach. They refused to pursue his case against Kerr-McGee Corporation. Maxwell was soon "reorganized" out of his job. Fortunately for us, he didn't stop doing his work just because he was forced into retirement. He continutes to pursue Kerr-McGee, now part of Anadarko, as a private citizen. All the major oil companies have joined Kerr-McGee to try and derail Maxwell's suit, but it remains scheduled for January.
Kerr-McGee/Anadarko may be saving up for the possible $50 million judgement in Maxwell's case. It is one oil company absent from the list of contributors to the successful No on 87 campaign in California. The oil and gas companies spent liberally to protect their profits from the California proposal. $3,000,000 from BP (Beyond Petroleum?) on Nov. 1. $2,000,000 from Chevron on October 17. And another $4 million on Halloween. Scary enough? I stopped counting Chevron's contributions not halfway through the report and the total was $19 million. AERA ENERGY LLP, a company I've never heard of, invested over $17 million between Oct 4 and October 27. I guess they decided they were being cheap, so they ponied up another $2.5 million on the 30th. Occidental Petroleum, at least 4.8 million. ConocoPhillips donated at least $3 million. No big surprise, they got the result they paid for.
These mega-corporations, it is not controversial to say, have too much power. As long as we have no choice but to buy their product, their power only increases. To our detriment, as consumers and citizens.
Sources:
www.nytimes.com/2006/12/03/business/yourmoney/03whistle.html?ref=business
cal-access.ss.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1282414&session=2005
Popular Post
-
J ust finished my 071-431: TS: Microsoft SQL Server 2005 - Implementation and Maintenance exam an hour ago and this time, it was easier for...
-
So NASA found a planet like Earth last month or whenever . Yes, yes, yes! That means more closet space, more Starbucks and a new location to...
-
Citroen will showcase the new DS3 Cabriolet at the 2012 Paris Motor Show from September 27, but to prepare us, the French carmaker dropped...
-
I have been quite busy recently. Last week, I was in Singapore for the regional New Hire Bootcamp where I get to meet other newbies like me...
-
The Rhineland Palatinate state government had asked the Commission to pump €13 million into the firm as part of a rescue package which would...
-
David Roberts is a staff writer at Grist , an online enviro magazine. He's written a piece in TomPaine.com that deserves attention. As ...
-
Just ahead of its world premiere at the 2012 Paris Motor Show on September 27, Kia has nicked the covers off its all-new Carens MPV . The ...
-
Photo: Diane Edwardson, March 30, 2012. The Silver Lake Ave Public Staircase connects Allesandro Elementary School, Riverside Terrace, Rive...
-
Toyota has a go-slow policy on plug-in electrics. Despite having produced the RAV4 EV - the most useful, robust, and long-lived electric car...
-
Despite a rather high US$39,995 sticker price for the base edition of the Volt , Chevrolet’s range-extended hybrid has sold a record 2,831 u...
No comments:
Post a Comment