The Evening Standard yesterday brought us an excellent article exposing the failure of London's 'landmark' congestion charge scheme.
Despite undoubtedly cutting car use in the zone (the only vehicles mayor Ken Livingstone ever likes to discuss), the latest Department for Transport figures have shown that average morning traffic speeds in London have now fallen to 9.3mph - well below the 9.9mph recorded before the congestion charge was launched in 2003.
That screams abject failure. But what's the reason for this strange anomoly?
The answer, Douglas McWilliams of the Centre for Economics and Business Research writes, is that lorries and, in particular, buses are now clogging London's roads.
He blames the fact that most transport experts use models that understate the congestion impact of large vehicles like buses in cities, like London, with narrow, congested streets.
So they miss the point that a charge that mainly targets cars will only do a limited amount to reduce congestion.
Buses clogging roads
Our roads, McWilliams suggests, are increasingly clogged up by more buses than there is either space or need for, with the infamous 'bendy' buses singled out for particular blame.
In Britain we have twice as many buses as in Germany, France or Italy. Apparently we have a fifth of all the buses in the EU!
And as we have said on this blog many times before, it's not as if buses are particularly environmentally attractive. For all the space they take up, they spend large parts of the time virtually empty. Over all services, from beginning to end of routes, the average number of passengers in a bus is just eight.
Since a bus does, on average, just 3.6 miles to the gallon, and since half of bus journeys would not be undertaken if the buses were not there, McWilliams has calculated that extra buses have about the same environmental effect as driving the passengers around in Bentleys.
This is Ken Livingstone's idea of traffic management.
Environment suffers
And what's his idea of helping the environment or public health? To fill London's streets with excess numbers of vehicles that, in the course of their operation, stand stationary for extended periods both blocking other traffic and spewing harmful diesel fumes in often densely populated areas.
TfL's excuse for the traffic slow-down is roadworks. But that conveniently ignores the fact that Livingstone prevented many roadworks schemes from happening just after the C-charge started, so as to give a misleading impression that charging had raised traffic speeds.
As McWilliams so rightly concludes: "Ken Livingstone's old-fashioned, anti-car policy has to be replaced with a more modern and flexible approach that allows for the fact that, for some people, cars are the only option. Without such a shift, we risk simply grinding to a halt."
If Livingstone is too stuck in his ways to do it, maybe we need a different mayor who will.
Home » congestion charge » Same old traffic jams
Popular Post
-
V12 / 5.576 cc / 385 PS / 406 ft/lb (550 Nm) @ 4.000 / 0 - 62 mph (100 km/h): 6,6 s / Vmax: 155 mph (250 km/h) (click images for a larger ...
-
R4 / 1.169 cc / 50 PS / 68 ft/lb (92 Nm) @ 3.000 / 0 - 62 mph (100 km/h): 19,3 s (click images for a larger view)
-
We are delighted to report a new development. The ingenuity of the drivers of Aberdeen Cars never ceases to amaze! And delight! Here we see ...
-
With Easter on its way this weekend, I though it appropriate to explore the world of cute furry bunny art cars from around the world. There ...
-
Stream new song 20th Century by Swedish duo This Vision . Nice and catchy electro pop and...well that's pretty much it... 20th Cen...
-
V8 / 3.532 cc / 148 PS / 197 ft/lb (267 Nm) @ 2.600 (click images for a larger view)
-
After another year of 'fine tuning' Team Isetta returned to Hillsborough on the 26th of August 2012 to participate in the Parade ...
-
... сегодня у меня из машины стащили мой планшет Intuos3 =( не поленились просканили сигналку, стащили акуратно без взлома( у меня настроени...
-
Reports of the death of 4x4s greatly exaggerated A bit before Christmas, The Times splashed their front page with the almost gleeful headl...
No comments:
Post a Comment